« I'm Dreaming of a White Jesus | Main | The Haunted Land, Pt. VII »
7 de Enero, 2007
Michelle Maglalang Humiliates Herself Again
Categorized under Medios | Tags: hype, malkin
FIRST SHE DOESN'T KNOW what the hell is worth looking at in this War On Iraq, and then when her neurotic defocusing blows up like a truth IED in her constantly clapping mouth, she can't get an honest apology out, but skirts it and then reprints all the ridiculous and irrelevant slander that she so happily padded her original nonsense with! The Eternally Bitching Anchor Baby has absolutely no sense of shame. And hardly a crumb of integrity.
Has she apologized yet for endangering lives with her irresponsible and distracted blathering? Or just for something safe, like chasing a Kerry Photo until her virtual heels are ragged and her mind far away from that which she would rather not discuss? "Mister Lonely," indeed. Check the mirror, Queen of Unresolvable Anger. Project much?
I'll quote Maglalang here:
"While bloggers and a few mainstream journalists questioning sloppy war coverage [...] continue to try and hold the MSM accountable, what are media watchdogs whose job it is to police the industry doing? Churning out pabulum like this..."
Michelle, stop embarrasing yourself. You look like some spoiled tot screaming that she can't find her lollipop as the house burns down behind her.




Comentarios (10)
yo soy Horsedooty! dijo:
buenos dias todos,
Wasn't she one of the bloggers that was gonna go to Iraq an show us how safe it is there outside the Green Zone? If so, did she go and if so, how did that work out for her.
yo soy Horsedooty!
Palabras por yo soy Horsedooty! spat forth on el 7 de Enero, 2007 at 07:32 AM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez dijo:
you know, horsedooty, i don't know...i read about that too. i don't think she has gone yet.
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez spat forth on el 7 de Enero, 2007 at 01:09 PM
h dijo:
Nezua,
Gracias senor,
I agree she has prolly not gone yet. She is still alive.
yo soy Horsedooty!
Palabras por h spat forth on el 7 de Enero, 2007 at 03:04 PM
interna dijo:
the woman is like hester prynne, the puritan,
alas she champions the people that genocided the phillipines.
what better agent for the fascistas?
a wanna be white woman that is a beautiful morena.
ay, se acabo, a greek trajedy.
that is why i sing for her dysfunction.
oye, mujer, go to the light! se your ancestors weep for your misdirection.
than again, off with her head! back to the walmart cookie factory.
this blog is muey chingon....
Palabras por interna spat forth on el 7 de Enero, 2007 at 03:52 PM
luisa dijo:
it is interesting how gender and feminine imagery is frequently deployed whenever an enemy is a female...
"beautiful morena."
"chasing a Kerry Photo until her virtual heels are ragged"
"bitching"
it reminds me of when i first became racially conscious. my teachers had me look in the paper and underline everytime someone's race was mentioned. for whites, it was never noted--race could be invisible. if the paper reported "james left his house around noon" readers would just assume james was white. whereas, if james was a person of color it was mentioned. the same thing can be said for gender. for men, gender is invisible. "A person walked up to me on the street" would mean a male person otherwise it would be "A woman walked up to me on the street."
Palabras por luisa spat forth on el 7 de Enero, 2007 at 07:09 PM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez dijo:
luisa, i understand what you are saying. and believe it or not, i went over this post before i posted it and tried to examine it to see if i was doing what you are implying i (and others) are doing. that doesn't mean i am sure to escape...what you are saying i have not. only to say i am trying to be conscious.
1. she is a beautiful morena! i would guess the purpose of bringing it up here is that it makes her more effective as a tool of the right, or as a tool to make something ugly, like hate, more palatable.
2. i really dont know that i meant high heels...just those things on the bottom of feet..the things that would get ragged were one to chase something. so is that still remarkable in your view?
3. i use "bitching" for male and female. would you say that i was feminizing a man if i use it for him and thus it is still wrong? i guess my earnest question here is: is it wrong to use "bitching" for anyone?
thanks, as always, for your input.
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez spat forth on el 7 de Enero, 2007 at 07:43 PM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez dijo:
and yeah, that makes sense.in this culture the White Male is dominant, thus default in our assumptions of symbols of personage. not desirable, but logical.
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez spat forth on el 7 de Enero, 2007 at 08:20 PM
Syntax dijo:
First she's wrong about Jamil Hussein when a simple Google search would've produced him. I especially liked the link from the newiraq.com . Second, she takes a pic of Kerry and shallows it for her own dying agenda. The bitch is just plain pathetic. Her "legion of 12" will carry on for her though because those acolytes are unedukated two.
For someone who hates the Mainstream Media, anybody catch her on Faux News filling in for O'Reilly? SHHHHUUUUUURRRRRREEEEEE she hates the mainstream media. It shows!
Palabras por Syntax spat forth on el 7 de Enero, 2007 at 10:53 PM
luisa dijo:
"1. she is a beautiful morena! i would guess the purpose of bringing it up here is that it makes her more effective as a tool of the right, or as a tool to make something ugly, like hate, more palatable"
yes, i agree that using a beautiful woman to voice conservative views might make these thoughts more agreeable but, the flip side of the coin is that she will be sexualized when protested against.
2) I was thinking of "high heels" as in the shoes with points and height which men don't usually wear.
3) on "bitching": well, i think in the context of our society women are the ones viewed as "bitching" instead of complaining or make dumb arguements backing oppression. it occured to me that people don't usually say that Bush or the minutemen are bitching and, when they do, it is not only to render their arguement invalid but to feminize them (bush wouldn't think feminization is flattering). sort of like saying "you throw like a girl"...
Palabras por luisa spat forth on el 7 de Enero, 2007 at 11:27 PM
Nezua Limón Xolagrafik-Jonez | dijo:
1. well..i think you are shifting on me here. i agree that her being sexualized is a downside to the Right's using her beauty as part of their arsenal, but I was only bringing up why I think the point of her beauty was used here...which was to point out that the Right is using that aspect to disguise their hateful agenda. I am not arguing that it is a good idea to user her beauty or a beautiful woman to do that thing—or that there are no drawbacks to that strategy (such as a response that sexualizes her).
2. i think i did not intend to imply high heels, but i can see how it can be read that way. i was using heels as "soles" as well as "dragging one's heels," as in being stubborn, intractable, refusing to come up to speed.
3. i thought about this. i can see how one might argue that "bitching" originated out of a slur on women, and therefore someone could argue that any use of the word must refer back to that original slur. still i am sad..."complaining" is a weak-ass word, and i really do need a stronger more insulting word. it doesn't have to insult women...but i need something better than "whining" or "complaining." "bitching" has a violent sound to the very word, what with the hard "b" at the start, and of course the visceral "tch." i am open to suggestions for further slander against malkin or anyone else when calling out their incessant....complaining.
4. all this and you didn't even make a comment about my use of the word "skirts" to mean "avoids"? ;)
Palabras por Nezua Limón Xolagrafik-Jonez | spat forth on el 7 de Enero, 2007 at 11:49 PM