| |
THE HOST (Original title Guimul
or Gwoemul, or "Creature") is a Horror
flick by South Korean filmmaker Bong
Joon-Ho (Barking Dogs Never Bite, Memories of Murder)
that takes the monster movie genre and thrashes it with a long,
green tentacle into something refreshing, emotionally engaging,
funny, and undeniably scary in moments.
In the Asian
Film Awards (a presentation of the Hong Kong International
Film Festival Society), the film won 4 out of 10 awards, including
Best Film, Best Actor (Kang-ho Song plays Kang-Du), Best Visual
Effects and Best Cinematography (Kim Yung-goo ).
In Nezua's Hot Chile Pepper Scale, The Host
wins 4 1/2 Habaneros out of a possible 5. Half a pepper lost
to a few holes in the story that I am personally willing to overlook,
given the whole tamale, which was a taste treat of high quality.
PLOT: An American Army doctor at a US base morgue in South Korea
orders a Korean doctor to dump a huge amount of toxic chemical
(formaldehyde) down a sink drain. The Korean doctor protests,
as this will directly pollute the Han River. The American doctor
arrogantly tells the conscientious dissenter that it's a "broad"
river, so he ought to think "broad-mindedly." (This
is not some anti-American stance pulled out of thin air, but based
on an actual
event.) The toxic agent eventually causes mutations in the
river's denizens and a beast emerges from the dark waters of the
Han to terrorize the populace.
The government quarantines the city claiming a new and deadly
contagion (virus) is being spread by the beast (though the veracity
of this claim is dubious), our heroine gets swallowed by THE HOST,
and thus begins our newest monster movie—one that follows
a traditional genesis, perhaps, but that is not predictable by
any means.
THEMES: Sacrifice, Forgiveness, Redemption, Responsibility. |
|
|
THE CAST: Hee-bong (Byun Hee-bong) runs a food stand in a park
(Han River Citizen's Park), the kind you'll see in New York's
subway tunnels or on the streets or in the Parks, there.
Gang-du (Song Kang-ho) is his son, a slow, absent-minded but
good-hearted man who is always falling asleep and who, we learn,
may be this way due to malnutrition as a child. You can keep track
of him most of the time by his hair which is partly bleached blonde.
It's a great touch that makes him feel somewhat adolescent or
not-quite-serious. Which makes sense, because he begins his arc
as a child in a man's body, essentially. We learn that Gang-du
was left pretty much on his own growing up, for Hee-bong (the
father) was not there. This is not set up early in any maudlin
or dramatic way, and we only learn it later in the film. The revealing
of this information feels very organic to the storyline.
Gang-du's siblings razz him pretty good, for he is the family's
fool. Yet, he is complex, as all the characters are. While the
clumsy, distracted, childlike fool, he consistently shows more
bravery than many on screen with him. We see a fierce heart come
to life even before his daughter, Hyun-seo (Ko Ah-sung) is kidnapped
by the monster.
Nam-joo (Bae Doona) is the family's pride, an amateur competitive
archer who seems to struggle with personal ability and limits.
She is good...but not great. We see her compete on TV, and she
wins a medal for her amazing aim. Her confidence, though, or perhaps
her speed is holding her back.
The other brother, Nam-il (Park Hae-il), was apparently a radical
in his college days, but is presently angry, often drunk, and
out of work. It is interesting in his arc that in his past he
was a radical protestor and he ends his arc by throwing molotov
cocktails in an attempt to destroy the HOST, a creature spawned
by uncaring authorities/government.
Hee-Bong's wife has died, and Gang-du's wife has run off, but
I do not feel that in this film women are treated derisively,
or as passive objects (unlike in the gross example of Joel
Shumacher's Falling
Down. It is true that it is more a story about fathers
than mothers, but that seems to be a narrative choice, and not
necessarily due to any decision (unconscious or otherwise) to
denigrate the Female or Feminine. The derision and two-dimensional
portrayal is saved for the (Male, Doctor) Americans. In fact,
regarding female portrayal, the youngest girl, Hyun-seo (who is
faced with the greatest horrors) is very brave and resourceful.
She is both a warrior as well as a nurturer, as she braves the
beast, as well as protects and cares for a young boy. Also, Nam-joo
has her own arc, her own conflict, and is very instrumental in
"saving the day" ...to the extent that the day is saved,
that is. |
|
AS A LIFE-LONG AMERICAN CITIZEN, I find it
very interesting and instructive to peek outside of the
solid wall of propaganda and disinformation that I am flooded
with by American moviemakers and media creators. And beyond
that, I really enjoy seeing things from other points of
view.
When I went to NYU to study film, one of my first roommates
was a guy from Sweden. I remember coming up on him reading
one day. He was reading a guidebook about Americans. I had
never in my life seen anything like it. It wasn't outrageous,
just a practical view on what to expect from Americans,
and how we thought about things. But it did not speak to
Americans, only about them. Not with a negative slant, just
with an eye toward preparing a young person to be immersed
in a new culture. It said things like "Americans are
obsessed with smelling good. They are very averse to body
odors of any type. They use many products to insure that
they smell pleasant, so make sure to..." I found it
fascinating. It actually hadn't occurred to me that there
was another way to be. I know, pretty ignorant. But NYU
was my first heavy exposure to citizens from all over the
world. And I am very glad for that. It had a drastic effect
on my thinking.
In The Host, we see Americans from an odd angle.
Not as wise, strong, heroes, but rather as arrogant, stupid,
destructive, domineering authority figures. We see them
in the context of US Military bases in South Korea.
The first doctor is condescending and a fool. That doesn't
stop him from being an effective authoritarian.I love how
his puffy face, blanched an ill shade of pale by the overhead
lighting really comes across as cruel, what with his obvious
sadistic quality and his dark eyesockets. He says "and
that's an order" without even turning around.
I find it also interesting to note that both times the
American doctors order the Korean doctors to do something,
it is not only a harmful order, but a senseless
one. The first doctor claims that the bottled formaldehyde
is "dirty." He wipes a gloved hand over the dust
on the glass bottle as if inspecting a new recruit's boots.
He takes all the requisite joy you would imagine a cruel,
bullying drill sergeant might in the same endeavor.
Then, instead of simply demeaning the Korean doctor by
telling him to wash hundreds of bottles, he tells him to
dump them, to throw them out. And to do so against regulations,
into a sink that will drain directly into the Han River.The
order is not only terribly ignorant and harmful, but really,
absolutely without reason.
|
| The Korean doctor complies. |
|
| |
|
|
IT IS SIX YEARS before we see the ultimate mutation
of that dumped chemical, before we see the creature that will
threaten and terrorize and feed upon the people of this city.
There are mutated fishes found after two years, but they are but
a slim and friendly shadow of what is to soon rise up out of Seoul's
Han River.
As I said, I want to avoid showing The HOST, to
avoid damping the impact for those who will watch the film. I
won't tell you how it first appears. But what I really appreciate
about this film is that we often are led right up to the edge
of typical Horror Film devices, and then Bong Joon-Ho will choose
another way. This keeps the American viewer (I cannot really speak
for Korean viewers) on the edge of the seat, and really makes
for some truly scary moments.
The way the monster comes into the picture is completely
atypical, and actually feels very realistic. It throws you off-balance,
and much of the film continues this subversion of expectation.
These filmmakers (Bong Joon-Ho along with co-writers
Chul-hyun Baek and Wong-jun Ha) know how to do widespread
panic. Right away I think of Godzilla (another creature spawned
by human science) and I also thought of when I lived in NYC during
9/11. Just the TV scenes that I still have on tape. They easily
mirror these scenes, where the monster is tearing ass about the
city and citizens are running slow-motion (as well as regular
speed) in a blind panic. It is kinetic, scary, fantastic, dreamlike
and at the same time, authentic. If you have your TV or computer
hooked up to good speakers with some bass, turn it up a little.
The pounding of the running beast is a really great (and scary)
part of the sound design used throughout the film. |
|
Like Shaolin
Soccer (a great Hong Kong flick by Stephen Chow)
this movie uses a really bizarre (but brilliant) blend of
different, unexpected styles/emotions.
This is a point I'd like to highlight about this entire
movie. I absolutely loved how comedy, tragedy, drama, slapstick
physicality, and deep themes could be interwoven so unexpectedly
and smoothly that you were never quite sure where to place
your feet.
The mastery comes in with the fact that I did not end
up confused or feeling annoyed or detached. I engaged the
characters throughout, and I didn't get my film-clit rubbed
numb by heavy-handed teenage director skillz, a repetitive
and irksome hammering with well-worn emotional devices,
or drowned in bloated orchestral balloons of sound that
boss your feelings about.
(The best sound design is like cologne/perfume applied
properly. It ought not to overwhelm, only to slip under
your guard and tag your emotions. But I'm not going to comment
much on the sound design, because that is an element I normally
start noting on a multiple screening, and I've only seen
this film once.)
I would not be suprised at all if these blends of styles/genres
I mentioned were more unusual to me as someone who has watched
mostly American film, than to, perhaps, those who watch
mostly Asian cinema. Don't get me wrong—in my education
as well as in the course of my own personal viewing, I have
watched a bit of Italian cinema, New Wave French cinema,
Hong Kong cinema, and other non-American filmmaking. So
I do hve some kind of comparison. Enough to know that American
films too often tend to be heavy-handed, obvious, rigid,
and formulaic. Perhaps some people more acquainted with
Korean or Asian cinema can comment with their thoughts on
the comparison.
Either way, it's always refreshing to note how a talented
filmmaker can veer back and forth between unusual elements.
This scene is a good example of what I was mentioning.
The blending of styles.
This is a scene where great tragedy has struck. The youngest
girl in the family, has been snatched by the creature. Her
father (center, olive shirt) has just watched her actually
be carried away in the creature's tentacles and eaten. Many
citizens have been killed, and the city is in a state of
emergency. Blockades are up, police are in the streets,
military has taken control.
The citizens, here, are in a post-Katrina type of setting,
an empty gym, or something. There are pictures on the walls
that remind me of New York after 9/11: images of the dead
stare back from the temporary tributes and family members
are wailing for their lost ones.
Rather than have a teary, heartrending moment where the
orchestra swells, Joon-Ho bravely jerks the film into sheer
ludicrousness and comedy by having the family collapse into
a mass of over-the-top and clumsy brawling and wailing while
the papparazzis circle them and bathe them in a wash of
flashbulbs.
This makes a serious comment on the ravenous appetites
and lack of humanity (sometimes) on the part of the mechanism
of Media while also breaking the tension of both fear and
sorrow.
Yet, it somehow does not derail the ongoing narrative or
momentum. Brilliant pacing and narrative choices. And a
really hilarious moment. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
THE LAIR of the creature. A sewer hidden under
a bridge. This is truly a nasty and unsettling series of scenes.
Dead bodies are dropped here, half-eaten bodies, bones washed
clean of meat by stomach acids, and even live humans emerge from
the foul maw of the beast. This dark, colorless and gory pit becomes
our heroine's home while her family searches for her. Young Hyun-Seo
endures moments that would surely turn a person's hair white.
The creature is CG and done very, very well. These
are not the monster movies of my youth, although Jurassic
Park was also quite amazing. It's very hard to find moments
where the effects are unbelievable, and for the most part, you
simply experience it as real.
In this pit with Hyun-Seo is a little boy. He was
dumped into the pit and managed—probably because of his
smaller size (Like Hyun-Seo)—to escape the creature's mouth
mostly unharmed. We met him earlier when he and his older brother
were foraging for food. His older brother and he get separated,
and the HOST is kind enought to escort the boy into the sewers.
When the kids, nurturing their own hope, talk about
what foods they will eat once they escape, Hyun-seo says "A
beer." Of course, we think of her father, Gang-Du, who actually
gave her a beer while hanging out with her in Hee-Bong's stand.
In that earlier scene, she objects, claiming she is too young.
Her father assures her as a middle-schooler that she is old enough.
It is not a regular thing, as we can see, and more than paint
a picture of a deviant or alcoholic father, it shows us his "juvenile"
and not-grown-up quality. Irresponsible, one might say. As I said,
Gang-Du begins this film as a man-child.
Either way, Hyun-Seo's choice is out of character
(for a young American film heroine that's for sure) and while
funny, it also casts the horror of the situation in starker relief.
After all, this girl is scared, starving, trapped and watching
carloads of bones be vomited clean into a bloody pit, and shrinking
under the foul air coming from a man-sized mouth that opens and
closes and resembles something like a bizarre human orifice or
a wicked flesh flower with sharp teeth and and a bad case of reverse-peristalsis.
For her to say "I want a big, juicy, cheeseburger when I
get out of here" or something similar just wouldn't convey
any of The Craze of the situation. And it is touching, as it is
a way of saying "I want my father" in this context without
being ham-handed about it.
For Joon-Ho (the filmmaker) to deliver that beer
into the pit from the gullet of the monster only moments
later is both funny and unsettling...is it fate's statement that
she will never get the chance to get out and have that beer? A
dour wink from a sentient monster? Or a sign that her escape is
closer than she thinks? |
| |
|
|
AGAIN, we veer wildly in emotions and styles of
storytelling.
Watching Gang-Du struggle in quarantine with bits
of information that come his way about his daughter is a torment.
Nobody but he, and soon, his family are aware that she is still
alive. Of course nobody listens to his complaints. But then, finally
someone seems to.
The second American doctor. He is cross-eyed and
after asking "Why didn't you tell the authorities about this?"
in an incredulous manner, Gang-Du besgins to cry and rant in sadness,
relief, and frustration.
At this, the American Doctor delivers a rather insane
assertion that the virus has clearly "spread to this man's
brain." He now believes it to be contained in Gang-Du's "frontal
lobe." He orders a Korean doctor to excise it. We don't know
if we are about to watch a lobotomy, but all signs point to Yes.
This scene has almost a Jerry Lewis feel to it. If Jerry Lewis
were channeling Clive Barker.
Gang-Du is strapped down and I am reminded of A
Clockwork Orange, which also toyed with humor and horror
in the same tale. This scene finds you alternating between giggles
and grimaces, and it is not entirely pleasant. As I said, it keeps
you off-balance. A wacky-looking and acting doctor comes and spins
a ridiculous and horrifying diagnosis that will end in another
man's being brain-damaged while his daughter, still alive, sits
in a sewer with a beast.
Gang-Du protests and screams, alternates between
anger and sorrow and fear. He overhears one of the doctors say
that there is really no virus at all while they prepare for the
operation. This increased the comic feel of it. (We already suspect
that the "virus" meme is but a government control mechanism
for various reasons, one of which is that we hear other characters
angrily claim the same. Further, we see no evidence of any outbreak
despite the fearful newscasts that the authorities have used to
"inform" the people of the danger.) As another review
says, more or less, you suddenly realize you are laughing at a
lobotomy, and you just aren't sure how to feel about any of it.
To me, this sense of high comedy and blank-faced
lunacy blended with moments of bottomless horror is exactly the
sensation of many moments in great crisis and extended, unthinkable
emergencies.
|
| |
|
| |
There are a few times when you have to ask yourself
who the antagonist is in the film. Is it the HOST? The monster?
Or is it the State? Because the family is more often struggling
with dangerous authority than it is the HOST.
Much of the conflict in this film comes from the
police, the military, or the medical/government authorities. This
is clearly not accidental. SARS, Vietnam and possibly many other
allusions are included (some I'm sure I didn't catch, being an
American). From unneeded lobotomies to ignoring requests to save
trapped family members to using TV Newscasts to inform the scared
people in the gym rather than speaking to them, the government
in this movie is not a helpful one, and occupies an equal spot
in terms of antagonist as does the HOST.
Early on, aside from the dumping of poisonous chemicals
into the water supply, we see evidence of a bullying, lying system
of authority. For example, when all the people are in the gym/emergency
shelter area, a man in a biohazard suit comes into the room and
begans demanding to know who came in contact with the host. We
understand that these people are probably not in for a lollipop.
While the entirety of these traumatized people are obeisant, the
angry, ex-radical Nam-Il stands up and asks the government agent
"Shouldn't you be explaining first?" (paraphrase).
At the end, the military decides to dump a massive
amount of "Agent Yellow" (shades of Vietnam, anyone?)
into the public areas to kill the HOST. Masses of protestors are
gathered, and the government is unsympathetic. There are some
very funny moments in a cab where Il-Nam is preparing molotov
firebombs for a confrontation with The HOST, and the cabbie snorts
at him. "Nobody uses those at protests anymore!"
From the start and to the end, the government is
positioned as an agent of harm, irresponsiblity, and as a massive,
stupid machinery that hinders people as much as helps them. |
|
I'd love, at this point to talk about some of
the character arcs. But I won't, as I promised a mostly spoiler-free
review. The movie is too new for me to do a full Analysis (and
thus, this Review), but perhaps once it has been out for a while,
I will come back to it. Because I really love what the story does
with the characters and with upsetting expectations. The "lessons"
are not always cemented, tho there are some very interesting questions
posed.
There is a moment in the stand, at the end of the
film, where a character picks up a gun and points it out the window.
We are led to believe that there may be danger outside, danger
rising from the Han River. For it is the same river, after all.
And who knows where the mutation will strike again? Or where it
already has?
But the fear of the river and the producing of the
gun doesn't arrive that tired horror-film Last Scene way. You
know what I mean: Everyone is laughing on the summer porch and
then there is a huge BANG and we all jump. But it's only
the kitty at the screen door, hahahaha, yawn. No, here, the gun
coming up quietly is a device used in film where a movement or
style or phrase is picked up by someone (else) and you know that
a circle has been completed, and this person has taken up a role,
or a torch of a sort from someone else. Or a belief. Or a duty.
I won't say more. But watch for guns peeking out of windows. And
hungry orphans.
In the end, there is
no singular HERO who comes through to save the day, as in many
American films; no theme of the might of the individual reinforced
here. Do watch for teamwork in bringing the final resolution about,
even unintended teamwork.
The movie ends with the stand, alone in a dark night
at the edge of a river. Quite an isolated image, and yet it makes
perfect sense. The only times we see people moving as one is in
a tense crowd under police control, or in a panicked, thoughtless
full-out blind run.
Otherwise? Hyun-Seo was isolated from her family
for most of the film. Gang-Du was isolated in his being a freak
to the rest of the family, as well as the one with the harshest
quarantine (and ultimately, lobotomy). The little boy in the sewer
was isolated from his older brother. The family is isolated in
their tragedy, moving about within the storm of the general public's
reaction and panic but yet unconnected to it and unseen. We might
even say the HOST was isolated in its circumstances and world.
Alone, one of a kind, not forged of its own will or doing, and
hiding out in the sewers. But if I were to end on that note, you
might feel this is another sad Frankenstein movie, and the HOST
doesn't feel that way. This is no poignant freak cast out of society.
This amphibious monster doesn't have a heart. And in my opinion,
Frankenstein is prettier. |
|
Comentarios (16)
Sylvia dijo:
I knew you'd like it! And yes, there were holes, as you mentioned, but...okay, I have to stop myself from gushing. ;) (I assumed that what was in the bottles wasn't formaldehyde, for example -- but at the same time, you can't really project too much assumption, right? Especially from the heavy "duplicitous Americans" theme. But the fact that the river did seem unguarded was something I hadn't even thought about.)
Can I link to this? I have a habit of doing spoiler critiques, and I don't want to ruin this for anyone who hasn't seen it. I think you've done a careful and excellent job here.
Palabras por Sylvia spat forth on el 9 de Abril, 2007 at 03:35 PM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez dijo:
thanks sylvia! it was tough to know exactly what to include or not, and mostly to stop talking! ;)
a good point you make about the bottles. that's just what that doctor said ("and that's an order!"), but he was hardly an honest-feeling cat.
of course you may link, graz, hermana.
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez spat forth on el 9 de Abril, 2007 at 03:37 PM
Rafael dijo:
I am not surprised of how the Americans are portrayed, not because of any anti-American feelings, but that they are the Bad Guys(tm) and following Hollywood tradition (which has enormous influence on all film makers around the world) the bad guys must always be arrogant, ignorant and imperious. What would upset the casual American viewer is that it is Americans portrayed this way, as opposed to Columbian drug dealers, Arab terrorist, Chinese Communist, Nazi SS officers, etc.
Palabras por Rafael spat forth on el 9 de Abril, 2007 at 05:10 PM
herm dijo:
i thought this was an excellent movie. i loved it.
Palabras por herm spat forth on el 9 de Abril, 2007 at 05:14 PM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez dijo:
hmmm. we also keep military bases there, though. these settings are military bases. it may be a feeling of being under authority, as well. not just that "bad guys" in movies are arrogant. after all, i can't imagine having another country's military bases on american soil...but if we had to i assure you tehre would be some type of common sentiment of resentment. then again, we are not south korea. but it seems that it would be a human reaction, to me. and not all antagonists are arrogant, ignorant, and imperious, after all. even in hollywood. the second doctor is especially interesting as he is not only arrogant, but clownlike. it's an odd mix. works real well.
i do agree about the roles being switched possibly feeling uncomfortable to many here in america. but that's okay. ya can't always be comfortable!
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez spat forth on el 9 de Abril, 2007 at 05:17 PM
Sylvia dijo:
I honestly saw the American presence as pretty tangential. They were a factor in the film but the movie never gives you a sense that the Americans play an integral role in its action. I think only one American character received a fair shake in the film, but I'm not gonna say which one. If you've seen the movie, you'll probably know which one I mean.
Anyone notice the nuances with language barriers?
Palabras por Sylvia spat forth on el 9 de Abril, 2007 at 05:51 PM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez dijo:
it was tangential in screentime for sure. but not narratively...i mean the american speaks first in the film, gives the order that causes the entire problem, and they speak english every time they speak, as well as give the senseless order to lobotomize an innocent man!
although i do agree...the american presence felt tangential, and it was only a couple blips while watching the story. but i'm not sure i can consider the narrative weight exactly tangential. In this film, Americans are clearly villainous in the extents of their ignorance and harmful effects.
not sure what you mean by language barriers. but remember finding out someone knew English at an odd moment. ;)
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez spat forth on el 9 de Abril, 2007 at 05:58 PM
Kai dijo:
Awesome job, Nezua. I haven't seen the movie yet, though I've been meaning to, with likely similar promptings as you. But I will certainly see it and soon!
Regarding the portrayal of Americans, well I'm afraid that's not a Hollywood-influenced thing, that's just how most of the world sees Americans. With reason. More specifically, in the final days of WWII the US chose not to drop an atom bomb on Europe (Germany) but dropped two (2) on Asia (Japan), which needless to say is the genesis of the Asian horror flick, a genre with an inescapably racial angle.
I appreciate your insightful observations, Nez, about the interweaving of styles of storytelling. This goes back to ancient storytelling techniques in Asia, from opera to puppet shows to epic poetry, wherein comedy and tragedy exist side-by-side in operatic tableaus that attempt to convey life's absurd heartbreak and humor.
I can't wait to see this flick!
Cheers. And thank you for your work, 'mano.
Palabras por Kai spat forth on el 9 de Abril, 2007 at 07:38 PM
Rafael dijo:
How does it feel to have American bases in your soil? Like you lost a piece of your soil, their min-Americas, from schools, to barracks, signs and buildings? Its Candyland with guns, lost of guns! :-)
Palabras por Rafael spat forth on el 9 de Abril, 2007 at 08:24 PM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez dijo:
el gusto es mio! kai, i love what you say about the ancient storytelling techniques...says so much about a culture, i find. their storytelling, as well as how death and life are seen. in mexican culture it seems much the same way, as far as death being a part of life, and thus all the skulls and skeletons, rituals such as dia de los muertos, etc.
and i couldn't help noticing the story styles, wow. i love stuff like this, it's very useful as an artist to absorb. rigidity = bad. again, what i loved about wong kar wai. he would just trade up protagonists n shit! took some getting used to, but i really love his filmmaking for its fluidity in a different way.
i look forward to when you see it, bro. plus i look forward to coming back to do a part two with spoilers so i can talk about character and stuff. honestly some of the greatest stuff for me was the character choices/themes. and wait til ya see how wicked this thing looks!!
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez spat forth on el 9 de Abril, 2007 at 08:26 PM
L.G. Fucktard dijo:
I haven't seen the film. Interesting that South Korea recently placed a temporary ban on Chinese beer, which apparently contains formaldehyde as a (cheap) anti-sediment agent.
Anyway, Here's one South Korean lawmakers' take on the movie.
Palabras por L.G. Fucktard spat forth on el 9 de Abril, 2007 at 08:41 PM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez dijo:
haha! quite an article. i love the formaldehyde as USA sperm! fantastic imagery and metaphor...and fury.
and there you go.
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez spat forth on el 9 de Abril, 2007 at 08:45 PM
L.G. Fucktard dijo:
Sorry. I heard once that formaldehyde is used in methamphetamine production, so I googled to confirm it (it is), and one thing led to another. Now I know that Korea has a meth problem (although the govt. denies it - here's a film about it), and that formaldehyde can be found in cigarettes, wood products, sewage treatment plants, the air we breathe, and Korean Soju (some say Soju just tastes like formaldehyde). Formaldehyde is "...mutagenic for mammalian somatic cells... mutagenic for bacteria and/or yeast... ." No doubt it's in all our sperm.
Palabras por L.G. Fucktard spat forth on el 9 de Abril, 2007 at 09:39 PM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez dijo:
wow. that's a very pleasant thought.
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez spat forth on el 9 de Abril, 2007 at 09:42 PM
L.G. Fucktard dijo:
And it is touching, as it is a way of saying "I want my father"... . For Joon-Ho to deliver that beer into the pit from the gullet of the monster only moments later is both funny and unsettling... is it fate's statement that she will never get the chance to get out and have that beer? A dour wink from a sentient monster? Or a sign that her escape is closer than she thinks?
Or a pleasant reminder that things could be worse, as per the old saying, "I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy?" Drinks with a beer barfing sewer beast beats a date with Doc Ratched any day, even if the booze is mutagenic.
Palabras por L.G. Fucktard spat forth on el 9 de Abril, 2007 at 11:11 PM
Sylvia dijo:
Ohhhh, man. When this movie goes on DVD, the gag order is LIFTED forever! Or maybe not because I'll be too busy watching it. ;-p
And I think I misspoke about American presence; you worded it how I meant to say it -- the movie made the American presence feel tangential, even though its role in the action was integral.
Also, if you're talking about who I think, that character knew English at two odd, yet very convenient moments. The first moment is barely noticeable, but you can say it's when things started spinning out of control.
Lastly, do you remember the scene with the literal "ancient" storyteller, and the small audience's reception to his story? That scene cracked me up, too, because of all the talk of priorities throughout the film. So many little nuggets of humor.
Palabras por Sylvia spat forth on el 9 de Abril, 2007 at 11:29 PM