« icebergs and gold | Main | Freedom on the March, Verdad »

9 de Abril, 2007

At the Movies With Nezua [The Host]

Categorized under At the Movies With Nezua! , Reviews | Tags:

grafik by NezuaFOR PURPOSES OF DEFINITION, let's consider the post I did on Falling Down a "Full Analysis," the post on Grave of the Fireflies an "Analysis," the post on Pan's Labyrinth a Character Study, and this post a Review.

What this will mean to you is that an Analysis will be entirely "spoilers." Only for people who don't mind having every single secret and event revealed and examined. Usually done with older movies, but not always.

A Review will be my attempt to discuss the movie, it's plot, its themes, and all other elements, but without giving away any spoilers, or with only giving away minimal spoilers. For those who are preparing to see a movie, or who don't want to learn too much in case they go to see it. This, will, of course curtail topics, or limit the depth of my discussion.

This post will be a Review of The Host, a Korean film by Bong Joon-Ho. I've tried my best to avoid giving too much away, and in fact, I purposely don't show even one image of THE HOST (the monster in this movie, that is). And in case you click no further, know that I heartily recommend it as an unusual and effective Horror film. Four and one half Habaneros out of Five.

.

THE HOST (Original title Guimul or Gwoemul, or "Creature") is a Horror flick by South Korean filmmaker Bong Joon-Ho (Barking Dogs Never Bite, Memories of Murder) that takes the monster movie genre and thrashes it with a long, green tentacle into something refreshing, emotionally engaging, funny, and undeniably scary in moments.

In the Asian Film Awards (a presentation of the Hong Kong International Film Festival Society), the film won 4 out of 10 awards, including Best Film, Best Actor (Kang-ho Song plays Kang-Du), Best Visual Effects and Best Cinematography (Kim Yung-goo ).

In Nezua's Hot Chile Pepper Scale, The Host wins 4 1/2 Habaneros out of a possible 5. Half a pepper lost to a few holes in the story that I am personally willing to overlook, given the whole tamale, which was a taste treat of high quality.

PLOT: An American Army doctor at a US base morgue in South Korea orders a Korean doctor to dump a huge amount of toxic chemical (formaldehyde) down a sink drain. The Korean doctor protests, as this will directly pollute the Han River. The American doctor arrogantly tells the conscientious dissenter that it's a "broad" river, so he ought to think "broad-mindedly." (This is not some anti-American stance pulled out of thin air, but based on an actual event.) The toxic agent eventually causes mutations in the river's denizens and a beast emerges from the dark waters of the Han to terrorize the populace.

The government quarantines the city claiming a new and deadly contagion (virus) is being spread by the beast (though the veracity of this claim is dubious), our heroine gets swallowed by THE HOST, and thus begins our newest monster movie—one that follows a traditional genesis, perhaps, but that is not predictable by any means.

THEMES: Sacrifice, Forgiveness, Redemption, Responsibility.

THE CAST: Hee-bong (Byun Hee-bong) runs a food stand in a park (Han River Citizen's Park), the kind you'll see in New York's subway tunnels or on the streets or in the Parks, there.

Gang-du (Song Kang-ho) is his son, a slow, absent-minded but good-hearted man who is always falling asleep and who, we learn, may be this way due to malnutrition as a child. You can keep track of him most of the time by his hair which is partly bleached blonde. It's a great touch that makes him feel somewhat adolescent or not-quite-serious. Which makes sense, because he begins his arc as a child in a man's body, essentially. We learn that Gang-du was left pretty much on his own growing up, for Hee-bong (the father) was not there. This is not set up early in any maudlin or dramatic way, and we only learn it later in the film. The revealing of this information feels very organic to the storyline.

Gang-du's siblings razz him pretty good, for he is the family's fool. Yet, he is complex, as all the characters are. While the clumsy, distracted, childlike fool, he consistently shows more bravery than many on screen with him. We see a fierce heart come to life even before his daughter, Hyun-seo (Ko Ah-sung) is kidnapped by the monster.

Nam-joo (Bae Doona) is the family's pride, an amateur competitive archer who seems to struggle with personal ability and limits. She is good...but not great. We see her compete on TV, and she wins a medal for her amazing aim. Her confidence, though, or perhaps her speed is holding her back.

The other brother, Nam-il (Park Hae-il), was apparently a radical in his college days, but is presently angry, often drunk, and out of work. It is interesting in his arc that in his past he was a radical protestor and he ends his arc by throwing molotov cocktails in an attempt to destroy the HOST, a creature spawned by uncaring authorities/government.

Hee-Bong's wife has died, and Gang-du's wife has run off, but I do not feel that in this film women are treated derisively, or as passive objects (unlike in the gross example of Joel Shumacher's Falling Down. It is true that it is more a story about fathers than mothers, but that seems to be a narrative choice, and not necessarily due to any decision (unconscious or otherwise) to denigrate the Female or Feminine. The derision and two-dimensional portrayal is saved for the (Male, Doctor) Americans. In fact, regarding female portrayal, the youngest girl, Hyun-seo (who is faced with the greatest horrors) is very brave and resourceful. She is both a warrior as well as a nurturer, as she braves the beast, as well as protects and cares for a young boy. Also, Nam-joo has her own arc, her own conflict, and is very instrumental in "saving the day" ...to the extent that the day is saved, that is.

AS A LIFE-LONG AMERICAN CITIZEN, I find it very interesting and instructive to peek outside of the solid wall of propaganda and disinformation that I am flooded with by American moviemakers and media creators. And beyond that, I really enjoy seeing things from other points of view.

When I went to NYU to study film, one of my first roommates was a guy from Sweden. I remember coming up on him reading one day. He was reading a guidebook about Americans. I had never in my life seen anything like it. It wasn't outrageous, just a practical view on what to expect from Americans, and how we thought about things. But it did not speak to Americans, only about them. Not with a negative slant, just with an eye toward preparing a young person to be immersed in a new culture. It said things like "Americans are obsessed with smelling good. They are very averse to body odors of any type. They use many products to insure that they smell pleasant, so make sure to..." I found it fascinating. It actually hadn't occurred to me that there was another way to be. I know, pretty ignorant. But NYU was my first heavy exposure to citizens from all over the world. And I am very glad for that. It had a drastic effect on my thinking.

In The Host, we see Americans from an odd angle. Not as wise, strong, heroes, but rather as arrogant, stupid, destructive, domineering authority figures. We see them in the context of US Military bases in South Korea.

The first doctor is condescending and a fool. That doesn't stop him from being an effective authoritarian.I love how his puffy face, blanched an ill shade of pale by the overhead lighting really comes across as cruel, what with his obvious sadistic quality and his dark eyesockets. He says "and that's an order" without even turning around.

I find it also interesting to note that both times the American doctors order the Korean doctors to do something, it is not only a harmful order, but a senseless one. The first doctor claims that the bottled formaldehyde is "dirty." He wipes a gloved hand over the dust on the glass bottle as if inspecting a new recruit's boots. He takes all the requisite joy you would imagine a cruel, bullying drill sergeant might in the same endeavor.

Then, instead of simply demeaning the Korean doctor by telling him to wash hundreds of bottles, he tells him to dump them, to throw them out. And to do so against regulations, into a sink that will drain directly into the Han River.The order is not only terribly ignorant and harmful, but really, absolutely without reason.

 

The Korean doctor complies.
   

IT IS SIX YEARS before we see the ultimate mutation of that dumped chemical, before we see the creature that will threaten and terrorize and feed upon the people of this city. There are mutated fishes found after two years, but they are but a slim and friendly shadow of what is to soon rise up out of Seoul's Han River.

 

As I said, I want to avoid showing The HOST, to avoid damping the impact for those who will watch the film. I won't tell you how it first appears. But what I really appreciate about this film is that we often are led right up to the edge of typical Horror Film devices, and then Bong Joon-Ho will choose another way. This keeps the American viewer (I cannot really speak for Korean viewers) on the edge of the seat, and really makes for some truly scary moments.

 

The way the monster comes into the picture is completely atypical, and actually feels very realistic. It throws you off-balance, and much of the film continues this subversion of expectation.

These filmmakers (Bong Joon-Ho along with co-writers Chul-hyun Baek and Wong-jun Ha) know how to do widespread panic. Right away I think of Godzilla (another creature spawned by human science) and I also thought of when I lived in NYC during 9/11. Just the TV scenes that I still have on tape. They easily mirror these scenes, where the monster is tearing ass about the city and citizens are running slow-motion (as well as regular speed) in a blind panic. It is kinetic, scary, fantastic, dreamlike and at the same time, authentic. If you have your TV or computer hooked up to good speakers with some bass, turn it up a little. The pounding of the running beast is a really great (and scary) part of the sound design used throughout the film.

 

Like Shaolin Soccer (a great Hong Kong flick by Stephen Chow) this movie uses a really bizarre (but brilliant) blend of different, unexpected styles/emotions.

This is a point I'd like to highlight about this entire movie. I absolutely loved how comedy, tragedy, drama, slapstick physicality, and deep themes could be interwoven so unexpectedly and smoothly that you were never quite sure where to place your feet.

The mastery comes in with the fact that I did not end up confused or feeling annoyed or detached. I engaged the characters throughout, and I didn't get my film-clit rubbed numb by heavy-handed teenage director skillz, a repetitive and irksome hammering with well-worn emotional devices, or drowned in bloated orchestral balloons of sound that boss your feelings about.

(The best sound design is like cologne/perfume applied properly. It ought not to overwhelm, only to slip under your guard and tag your emotions. But I'm not going to comment much on the sound design, because that is an element I normally start noting on a multiple screening, and I've only seen this film once.)

I would not be suprised at all if these blends of styles/genres I mentioned were more unusual to me as someone who has watched mostly American film, than to, perhaps, those who watch mostly Asian cinema. Don't get me wrong—in my education as well as in the course of my own personal viewing, I have watched a bit of Italian cinema, New Wave French cinema, Hong Kong cinema, and other non-American filmmaking. So I do hve some kind of comparison. Enough to know that American films too often tend to be heavy-handed, obvious, rigid, and formulaic. Perhaps some people more acquainted with Korean or Asian cinema can comment with their thoughts on the comparison.

Either way, it's always refreshing to note how a talented filmmaker can veer back and forth between unusual elements.

This scene is a good example of what I was mentioning. The blending of styles.

This is a scene where great tragedy has struck. The youngest girl in the family, has been snatched by the creature. Her father (center, olive shirt) has just watched her actually be carried away in the creature's tentacles and eaten. Many citizens have been killed, and the city is in a state of emergency. Blockades are up, police are in the streets, military has taken control.

The citizens, here, are in a post-Katrina type of setting, an empty gym, or something. There are pictures on the walls that remind me of New York after 9/11: images of the dead stare back from the temporary tributes and family members are wailing for their lost ones.

Rather than have a teary, heartrending moment where the orchestra swells, Joon-Ho bravely jerks the film into sheer ludicrousness and comedy by having the family collapse into a mass of over-the-top and clumsy brawling and wailing while the papparazzis circle them and bathe them in a wash of flashbulbs.

This makes a serious comment on the ravenous appetites and lack of humanity (sometimes) on the part of the mechanism of Media while also breaking the tension of both fear and sorrow.

Yet, it somehow does not derail the ongoing narrative or momentum. Brilliant pacing and narrative choices. And a really hilarious moment.

 
   

THE LAIR of the creature. A sewer hidden under a bridge. This is truly a nasty and unsettling series of scenes. Dead bodies are dropped here, half-eaten bodies, bones washed clean of meat by stomach acids, and even live humans emerge from the foul maw of the beast. This dark, colorless and gory pit becomes our heroine's home while her family searches for her. Young Hyun-Seo endures moments that would surely turn a person's hair white.

The creature is CG and done very, very well. These are not the monster movies of my youth, although Jurassic Park was also quite amazing. It's very hard to find moments where the effects are unbelievable, and for the most part, you simply experience it as real.

In this pit with Hyun-Seo is a little boy. He was dumped into the pit and managed—probably because of his smaller size (Like Hyun-Seo)—to escape the creature's mouth mostly unharmed. We met him earlier when he and his older brother were foraging for food. His older brother and he get separated, and the HOST is kind enought to escort the boy into the sewers.

When the kids, nurturing their own hope, talk about what foods they will eat once they escape, Hyun-seo says "A beer." Of course, we think of her father, Gang-Du, who actually gave her a beer while hanging out with her in Hee-Bong's stand. In that earlier scene, she objects, claiming she is too young. Her father assures her as a middle-schooler that she is old enough. It is not a regular thing, as we can see, and more than paint a picture of a deviant or alcoholic father, it shows us his "juvenile" and not-grown-up quality. Irresponsible, one might say. As I said, Gang-Du begins this film as a man-child.

Either way, Hyun-Seo's choice is out of character (for a young American film heroine that's for sure) and while funny, it also casts the horror of the situation in starker relief. After all, this girl is scared, starving, trapped and watching carloads of bones be vomited clean into a bloody pit, and shrinking under the foul air coming from a man-sized mouth that opens and closes and resembles something like a bizarre human orifice or a wicked flesh flower with sharp teeth and and a bad case of reverse-peristalsis. For her to say "I want a big, juicy, cheeseburger when I get out of here" or something similar just wouldn't convey any of The Craze of the situation. And it is touching, as it is a way of saying "I want my father" in this context without being ham-handed about it.

For Joon-Ho (the filmmaker) to deliver that beer into the pit from the gullet of the monster only moments later is both funny and unsettling...is it fate's statement that she will never get the chance to get out and have that beer? A dour wink from a sentient monster? Or a sign that her escape is closer than she thinks?

   

AGAIN, we veer wildly in emotions and styles of storytelling.

Watching Gang-Du struggle in quarantine with bits of information that come his way about his daughter is a torment. Nobody but he, and soon, his family are aware that she is still alive. Of course nobody listens to his complaints. But then, finally someone seems to.

The second American doctor. He is cross-eyed and after asking "Why didn't you tell the authorities about this?" in an incredulous manner, Gang-Du besgins to cry and rant in sadness, relief, and frustration.

At this, the American Doctor delivers a rather insane assertion that the virus has clearly "spread to this man's brain." He now believes it to be contained in Gang-Du's "frontal lobe." He orders a Korean doctor to excise it. We don't know if we are about to watch a lobotomy, but all signs point to Yes. This scene has almost a Jerry Lewis feel to it. If Jerry Lewis were channeling Clive Barker.

Gang-Du is strapped down and I am reminded of A Clockwork Orange, which also toyed with humor and horror in the same tale. This scene finds you alternating between giggles and grimaces, and it is not entirely pleasant. As I said, it keeps you off-balance. A wacky-looking and acting doctor comes and spins a ridiculous and horrifying diagnosis that will end in another man's being brain-damaged while his daughter, still alive, sits in a sewer with a beast.

Gang-Du protests and screams, alternates between anger and sorrow and fear. He overhears one of the doctors say that there is really no virus at all while they prepare for the operation. This increased the comic feel of it. (We already suspect that the "virus" meme is but a government control mechanism for various reasons, one of which is that we hear other characters angrily claim the same. Further, we see no evidence of any outbreak despite the fearful newscasts that the authorities have used to "inform" the people of the danger.) As another review says, more or less, you suddenly realize you are laughing at a lobotomy, and you just aren't sure how to feel about any of it.

To me, this sense of high comedy and blank-faced lunacy blended with moments of bottomless horror is exactly the sensation of many moments in great crisis and extended, unthinkable emergencies.

 

   

There are a few times when you have to ask yourself who the antagonist is in the film. Is it the HOST? The monster? Or is it the State? Because the family is more often struggling with dangerous authority than it is the HOST.

Much of the conflict in this film comes from the police, the military, or the medical/government authorities. This is clearly not accidental. SARS, Vietnam and possibly many other allusions are included (some I'm sure I didn't catch, being an American). From unneeded lobotomies to ignoring requests to save trapped family members to using TV Newscasts to inform the scared people in the gym rather than speaking to them, the government in this movie is not a helpful one, and occupies an equal spot in terms of antagonist as does the HOST.

Early on, aside from the dumping of poisonous chemicals into the water supply, we see evidence of a bullying, lying system of authority. For example, when all the people are in the gym/emergency shelter area, a man in a biohazard suit comes into the room and begans demanding to know who came in contact with the host. We understand that these people are probably not in for a lollipop. While the entirety of these traumatized people are obeisant, the angry, ex-radical Nam-Il stands up and asks the government agent "Shouldn't you be explaining first?" (paraphrase).

At the end, the military decides to dump a massive amount of "Agent Yellow" (shades of Vietnam, anyone?) into the public areas to kill the HOST. Masses of protestors are gathered, and the government is unsympathetic. There are some very funny moments in a cab where Il-Nam is preparing molotov firebombs for a confrontation with The HOST, and the cabbie snorts at him. "Nobody uses those at protests anymore!"

From the start and to the end, the government is positioned as an agent of harm, irresponsiblity, and as a massive, stupid machinery that hinders people as much as helps them.

I'd love, at this point to talk about some of the character arcs. But I won't, as I promised a mostly spoiler-free review. The movie is too new for me to do a full Analysis (and thus, this Review), but perhaps once it has been out for a while, I will come back to it. Because I really love what the story does with the characters and with upsetting expectations. The "lessons" are not always cemented, tho there are some very interesting questions posed.

There is a moment in the stand, at the end of the film, where a character picks up a gun and points it out the window. We are led to believe that there may be danger outside, danger rising from the Han River. For it is the same river, after all. And who knows where the mutation will strike again? Or where it already has?

But the fear of the river and the producing of the gun doesn't arrive that tired horror-film Last Scene way. You know what I mean: Everyone is laughing on the summer porch and then there is a huge BANG and we all jump. But it's only the kitty at the screen door, hahahaha, yawn. No, here, the gun coming up quietly is a device used in film where a movement or style or phrase is picked up by someone (else) and you know that a circle has been completed, and this person has taken up a role, or a torch of a sort from someone else. Or a belief. Or a duty. I won't say more. But watch for guns peeking out of windows. And hungry orphans.

In the end, there is no singular HERO who comes through to save the day, as in many American films; no theme of the might of the individual reinforced here. Do watch for teamwork in bringing the final resolution about, even unintended teamwork.

The movie ends with the stand, alone in a dark night at the edge of a river. Quite an isolated image, and yet it makes perfect sense. The only times we see people moving as one is in a tense crowd under police control, or in a panicked, thoughtless full-out blind run.

Otherwise? Hyun-Seo was isolated from her family for most of the film. Gang-Du was isolated in his being a freak to the rest of the family, as well as the one with the harshest quarantine (and ultimately, lobotomy). The little boy in the sewer was isolated from his older brother. The family is isolated in their tragedy, moving about within the storm of the general public's reaction and panic but yet unconnected to it and unseen. We might even say the HOST was isolated in its circumstances and world. Alone, one of a kind, not forged of its own will or doing, and hiding out in the sewers. But if I were to end on that note, you might feel this is another sad Frankenstein movie, and the HOST doesn't feel that way. This is no poignant freak cast out of society. This amphibious monster doesn't have a heart. And in my opinion, Frankenstein is prettier.

That half pepper loss of rating? A couple story holes, as I said. As an old science major, I was a bit skeptical of the relationship between Formaldehyde and mutations. I don't know enough about it, but I'd bet there's no relationship established. Also, I can't see a river being a site of such a massive government lockdown and yet having no obvious barricades or patrols or guards. After 9/11, you couldn't cross a single bridge or tunnel. Planes couldn't fly over the island, and if you lived north of Houston st, you couldn't go lower. Yet, in The Host, the river seemed strangely unguarded. Those were the big ones. But overall, the movie was so original and funny and amazing to watch and just plain fun that I quickly let go of those issues once I noted them.

To me, this is a movie I could not only watch twice, but without much pause between viewings. Great fun, and I recommend the biggest screen you can find.


NEXT: Full Analysis of 300. (Thanks for the suggestion, BA! And thanks to Sylvia for recommending The Host.)

digg | | delish

Comentarios (16)


Sylvia dijo:

GRVTR

I knew you'd like it! And yes, there were holes, as you mentioned, but...okay, I have to stop myself from gushing. ;) (I assumed that what was in the bottles wasn't formaldehyde, for example -- but at the same time, you can't really project too much assumption, right? Especially from the heavy "duplicitous Americans" theme. But the fact that the river did seem unguarded was something I hadn't even thought about.)

Can I link to this? I have a habit of doing spoiler critiques, and I don't want to ruin this for anyone who hasn't seen it. I think you've done a careful and excellent job here.


nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez dijo:

GRVTR

thanks sylvia! it was tough to know exactly what to include or not, and mostly to stop talking! ;)

a good point you make about the bottles. that's just what that doctor said ("and that's an order!"), but he was hardly an honest-feeling cat.

of course you may link, graz, hermana.


Rafael dijo:

GRVTR

I am not surprised of how the Americans are portrayed, not because of any anti-American feelings, but that they are the Bad Guys(tm) and following Hollywood tradition (which has enormous influence on all film makers around the world) the bad guys must always be arrogant, ignorant and imperious. What would upset the casual American viewer is that it is Americans portrayed this way, as opposed to Columbian drug dealers, Arab terrorist, Chinese Communist, Nazi SS officers, etc.


herm dijo:

GRVTR

i thought this was an excellent movie. i loved it.


nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez dijo:

GRVTR

hmmm. we also keep military bases there, though. these settings are military bases. it may be a feeling of being under authority, as well. not just that "bad guys" in movies are arrogant. after all, i can't imagine having another country's military bases on american soil...but if we had to i assure you tehre would be some type of common sentiment of resentment. then again, we are not south korea. but it seems that it would be a human reaction, to me. and not all antagonists are arrogant, ignorant, and imperious, after all. even in hollywood. the second doctor is especially interesting as he is not only arrogant, but clownlike. it's an odd mix. works real well.

i do agree about the roles being switched possibly feeling uncomfortable to many here in america. but that's okay. ya can't always be comfortable!


Sylvia dijo:

GRVTR

I honestly saw the American presence as pretty tangential. They were a factor in the film but the movie never gives you a sense that the Americans play an integral role in its action. I think only one American character received a fair shake in the film, but I'm not gonna say which one. If you've seen the movie, you'll probably know which one I mean.

Anyone notice the nuances with language barriers?


nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez dijo:

GRVTR

it was tangential in screentime for sure. but not narratively...i mean the american speaks first in the film, gives the order that causes the entire problem, and they speak english every time they speak, as well as give the senseless order to lobotomize an innocent man!

although i do agree...the american presence felt tangential, and it was only a couple blips while watching the story. but i'm not sure i can consider the narrative weight exactly tangential. In this film, Americans are clearly villainous in the extents of their ignorance and harmful effects.

not sure what you mean by language barriers. but remember finding out someone knew English at an odd moment. ;)


Kai dijo:

GRVTR

Awesome job, Nezua. I haven't seen the movie yet, though I've been meaning to, with likely similar promptings as you. But I will certainly see it and soon!

Regarding the portrayal of Americans, well I'm afraid that's not a Hollywood-influenced thing, that's just how most of the world sees Americans. With reason. More specifically, in the final days of WWII the US chose not to drop an atom bomb on Europe (Germany) but dropped two (2) on Asia (Japan), which needless to say is the genesis of the Asian horror flick, a genre with an inescapably racial angle.

I appreciate your insightful observations, Nez, about the interweaving of styles of storytelling. This goes back to ancient storytelling techniques in Asia, from opera to puppet shows to epic poetry, wherein comedy and tragedy exist side-by-side in operatic tableaus that attempt to convey life's absurd heartbreak and humor.

I can't wait to see this flick!

Cheers. And thank you for your work, 'mano.


Rafael dijo:

GRVTR

How does it feel to have American bases in your soil? Like you lost a piece of your soil, their min-Americas, from schools, to barracks, signs and buildings? Its Candyland with guns, lost of guns! :-)


nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez dijo:

GRVTR

el gusto es mio! kai, i love what you say about the ancient storytelling techniques...says so much about a culture, i find. their storytelling, as well as how death and life are seen. in mexican culture it seems much the same way, as far as death being a part of life, and thus all the skulls and skeletons, rituals such as dia de los muertos, etc.

and i couldn't help noticing the story styles, wow. i love stuff like this, it's very useful as an artist to absorb. rigidity = bad. again, what i loved about wong kar wai. he would just trade up protagonists n shit! took some getting used to, but i really love his filmmaking for its fluidity in a different way.

i look forward to when you see it, bro. plus i look forward to coming back to do a part two with spoilers so i can talk about character and stuff. honestly some of the greatest stuff for me was the character choices/themes. and wait til ya see how wicked this thing looks!!


L.G. Fucktard dijo:

GRVTR

I haven't seen the film. Interesting that South Korea recently placed a temporary ban on Chinese beer, which apparently contains formaldehyde as a (cheap) anti-sediment agent.

Anyway, Here's one South Korean lawmakers' take on the movie.


nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez dijo:

GRVTR

haha! quite an article. i love the formaldehyde as USA sperm! fantastic imagery and metaphor...and fury.

and there you go.


L.G. Fucktard dijo:

GRVTR

Sorry. I heard once that formaldehyde is used in methamphetamine production, so I googled to confirm it (it is), and one thing led to another. Now I know that Korea has a meth problem (although the govt. denies it - here's a film about it), and that formaldehyde can be found in cigarettes, wood products, sewage treatment plants, the air we breathe, and Korean Soju (some say Soju just tastes like formaldehyde). Formaldehyde is "...mutagenic for mammalian somatic cells... mutagenic for bacteria and/or yeast... ." No doubt it's in all our sperm.


nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez dijo:

GRVTR

wow. that's a very pleasant thought.


L.G. Fucktard dijo:

GRVTR

And it is touching, as it is a way of saying "I want my father"... . For Joon-Ho to deliver that beer into the pit from the gullet of the monster only moments later is both funny and unsettling... is it fate's statement that she will never get the chance to get out and have that beer? A dour wink from a sentient monster? Or a sign that her escape is closer than she thinks?

Or a pleasant reminder that things could be worse, as per the old saying, "I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy?" Drinks with a beer barfing sewer beast beats a date with Doc Ratched any day, even if the booze is mutagenic.


Sylvia dijo:

GRVTR
plus i look forward to coming back to do a part two with spoilers so i can talk about character and stuff. honestly some of the greatest stuff for me was the character choices/themes. and wait til ya see how wicked this thing looks!!

Ohhhh, man. When this movie goes on DVD, the gag order is LIFTED forever! Or maybe not because I'll be too busy watching it. ;-p

And I think I misspoke about American presence; you worded it how I meant to say it -- the movie made the American presence feel tangential, even though its role in the action was integral.

Also, if you're talking about who I think, that character knew English at two odd, yet very convenient moments. The first moment is barely noticeable, but you can say it's when things started spinning out of control.

Lastly, do you remember the scene with the literal "ancient" storyteller, and the small audience's reception to his story? That scene cracked me up, too, because of all the talk of priorities throughout the film. So many little nuggets of humor.

kick it, ése.

Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)