"inconsequential feminist-type drivel"

Wow. Xenophobia and misogyny all in one 3 word phrase. That has to be some kind of record.

Wait...they actually think that WWII and Iraq is a valid comparison? Who's spouting the drivel here? There are more and more reasons to distrust psychoanalysts, starting with that sexist fuck Freud.

That would explain those fine breasts of yours.

Is this person really a shrink, as in, does s/he have a B.A., even ... they have poor logic and poor research skills, would have trouble making it out of freshman year.

Congrats! If you're REALLY lucky, they'll indicate how important you are by suggesting you are too ugly to get laid and thus are feminist/will convert after a nice, hard fucking. ^^ You've arrived! *big thumbs up*

i think i'm learning that advocating war and violence is masculine. and thinking deeply and pondering peace and a more mature overview is....feminine.

I don't like what this says about my sex, about the other members of it.

"Is this person really a shrink, as in, does s/he have a B.A., even ... they have poor logic and poor research skills, would have trouble making it out of freshman year."

That's nice.

Care to provide an example of my "poor logic and poor research skills", or are you above that?

haha! wow, that's rich. sig/alf/carl can dish out an entire post of insults and pejoratives, but can't handle one critic on a comment thread on someone else's post? wow.
DON'T DISH IT OUT IF YOU CAN'T TAKE IT.

...erm, ok I'll try-your whole blog- for ten.
Actually that's not fair but you when you give a feedline as easy as that well, 'I can resist everything but temptation.'

sigmund, your reasoning isn't really worth entertaining for too long. you made a poor introduction of yourself by insulting me venomously, disparaging people on hormone therapy as well as women and just being sort of a dick—and now I expect you want everyone at my place to observe the formal rules of argument or something. it would be funny if not so repugnantly hypocritical and just plain stupid. i do let dissenters here speak, but the rule is el respeto, and you gave it up on your very first link.

now run back to your little blog and ooze some more hostility. i bet your readers will lap it up. ¿comprendes, mendes?

Messrs. Sigmund

Fallacy: ad hominen attack without a shred of evidence or fact to back it up. I saw that little chart on your site (guess curiosity got the best of me) and it so illogical as to make my old philosophy profs man their F-Grade cannons and deluge you with sort of ego busting ammunition that would destroy the most inflated towers of self in a manner of seconds.

And it also makes absolutely no sense to boot!

Been tagged by this idiot? You must be doing something right!

You hit the nail on the head. Sigmund Carl and Alfred is a venomous fraud, and operates a pathetic and vile blog that spews hate on Arabs, the Left and anyone with sense who doesn't agree with this sicko.

He hides behinds the skirts of a waste disposal PhD (I kid you not), Dr Santy, and doesn't give a real name. His identity is as much in evidence as his intellect, which is next to nothing.

The real giants Sigmund Carl and Alfred are turning in their graves with this putrid little man adopting their monikers.