« A Remembering | Main | Finalist - MTV Choose or Lose '08 »
9 de Octubre, 2007
They Remain Nervous
Categorized under Terrorizing la Gente , When the Right is SO wrong | Tags: AT&T, bush, NSA, war on terror, Wiretapping
ONCE IT SEEMED OUTRAGEOUS that our own government was colluding with telecom companies to spy on citizens and datamine our daily business in secret. Seems we've pretty much become used to it. Sort of how you don't feel the blows anymore, after enough land on you.
As the debate over the eavesdropping powers of the National Security Agency begins anew this week, the emerging measures reflect the reality confronting the Democrats.Although willing to oppose the White House on the Iraq war, they remain nervous that they will be called soft on terrorism if they insist on strict curbs on gathering intelligence.
A Democratic bill to be proposed on Tuesday in the House would maintain for several years the type of broad, blanket authority for N.S.A. eavesdropping that the administration secured in August for six months. [...]
A competing proposal in the Senate, still being drafted, may be even closer in line with the administration plan, with the possibility of including retroactive immunity for telecommunications utilities that participated in the once-secret program to eavesdrop without court warrants.
When I found out about the wiretapping a year or two ago (2005?) I was furious and wanted to sever my AT&T account immediately. Mi novia is more practical, and said "let's wait until the contract is over, or we'll lose our deposit. It's only two more months." And so we waited, because principle is always preferred, but you can't buy food with it. And then when we came out west it was "but my mother wants to put us on her plan." So I tried to joke. "Well, at least I'm only paying a small amount a month to be spied on."
But my fancy phone became an ugly instrument to my eye. A rot-spot in any room wherein I saw it. A glossy imp's trinket left behind to capture my life. I would turn to see it innocently laid upon the chair and it would slow me down for a moment, insert a grain of paranoia. Can they activate the camera? I would think to myself. I would turn the phone over so that the small fisheye faced the chair cushion. I would turn it off and stuff it underneath pillows so nobody could spy on me. But I've already told you bout my thoughts on our government. 9/11 tore free the veneer, qué no? Like sick victimizers, they reach into our deepest fears and use them against us. Aggravate a trauma to keep us under control. Who does this but a sadist and a predator? They do not work at peace. They work at terror. At keeping us terrorized. And so, yes. It works. Fear grows when continually nourished.
I grew to loathe that phone, the one I once loved so much I bought it in Manhattan the day before it was released to the public. Had to come back the next day to pick it up. I was happy to import new wallpaper I had shot and edited in Photoshop, happy to add new numbers, happy to play with the voice-activation and the bluetooth. Now, it's off finally. Dead. I don't even need to turn it on to look up numbers (because my phone and Mac sync up and share info and it's all on my computer). And I feel good about that. I feel great about that. I figure its worth using some payphones, as long as they last; or not being able to call home from the cereal aisle.
It angered me to accept what I knew about the phone companies, day in and day out. How they had let those junction intercept rooms be built. In secret. Recording my information, bombarding me with saccharin marketing, and scooping up my money. And here I am, carrying a means of violating my own privacy around on my person. How gross. They really do know we have nowhere else to go. What are you going to do in place of accepting such violation? String cans together? We swallow it, and when there is nothing else to do, we mumble "Well, I don't have anything to hide." And that's the worst part. The worst part is feeling so bullied. It felt better to have that outrage that our principles were being violated. But once we were done being outraged about the "principle" of it...we mostly fell in line with those who once argued against our outrage with lines like "if you have nothing to worry about, what are you worried about?" We use the flipside to comfort ourselves, soften the harsh reality of our acquiescence. Or I was.
Democrats may "remain nervous," but I don't like living in fear. And I refuse to be violated and then tell myself some bullshit to justify it for the party at fault. In fact, I'd rather live almost any other way. Even if it means you can't reach me at every moment.
I'm willing to reconsider and begin feeding AT&T et al that fat monthly fee again—if those in office have the stones to protect my privacy.
But you know, I'll be okay without the phone, too.




Comentarios (21)
Rafael dijo:
Excellent post. I don't have a cell phone right now, but I am sure that my internet traffic is monitored "just in case". I wrote my manifesto in response. The Democrats are not nervous, they are afraid, and they push their fear on us. Afraid of doing the right thing, instead of doing the "convenient" thing. Disgusting indeed!
Palabras por Rafael spat forth on el 9 de Octubre, 2007 at 11:06 AM
El Ahuitzotl dijo:
I do not expect any of these corporations to protect privacy, even when the claim it is their priority. It isn't their business, but it is their business to collaborate as much as possible with the government, probably their biggest costumer and certainly the most powerful one.
Late year a very disturbing story appeared regarding "roving bugs", which permit authorities like the FBI to turn on the microphone in certain GSM phones even when the phones are turned off. This is hardly surprising but it made me less trustworthy of closed-sourced, corporate technology.
I try to use a common sense approach in communications. If there is something that should not be public, then I don't let it pass through normal, corporate channels, and if I can't avoid it, then at least it should pass through open-source, transparent, encryption systems like Tor. Cell phones are essentially impossible to trust beyond reasonable doubt, but they still have their uses.
Palabras por El Ahuitzotl spat forth on el 9 de Octubre, 2007 at 11:39 AM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
dijo:
thanks rafa
--
no, you are right el ahuitzotl. that was sort of an insincere if-then phrase, i admit.
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
spat forth on el 9 de Octubre, 2007 at 11:44 AM
EYES OF TEXAS dijo:
If you're not doing anything illegal, why worry about it? If you are doing something illegal, then you deserve to be caught before your criminal ways do damage to someone else.
Palabras por EYES OF TEXAS spat forth on el 9 de Octubre, 2007 at 12:48 PM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
dijo:
did someone drop a tool in here?
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
spat forth on el 9 de Octubre, 2007 at 12:50 PM
El Ahuitzotl dijo:
Sure seems like it... maybe a troll.
Phil Zimmerman has explained privacy better than I ever could. One of my favorites is "when privacy is outlawed, only outlaws will have privacy." Nice turn on the right-wing phrase du jour.
Palabras por El Ahuitzotl spat forth on el 9 de Octubre, 2007 at 01:07 PM
Tom dijo:
Eyes, here's a wake-up call for anyone who might be naive enough to believe that "only the guilty have anything to fear." This wake-up call happens to come from the Reagan administration's Paul Craig Roberts.
Palabras por Tom spat forth on el 9 de Octubre, 2007 at 01:31 PM
Rafael dijo:
Trust the authorities, they always do the right thing. They are incorruptible, always seeking truth, justice and the American way! Pedenjo....
Palabras por Rafael spat forth on el 9 de Octubre, 2007 at 02:23 PM
jim in austin dijo:
This stuff is old hat to someone who grew up in the thick of the Cold War, the Red Scare with a Communist hiding under every rock. Trillions of dollars poured into the Military Industrial Complex over decades because no one wanted to be painted as weak on Communism, a Pinko or a Communist Sympathizer. Wars all over the globe, one after another, as predictable as clockwork. Same song, second verse. To quote that bastion of democracy and freedom, Reichmarshall Hermann Goering:
“… After all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Palabras por jim in austin spat forth on el 9 de Octubre, 2007 at 02:29 PM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
dijo:
so true. i've read that quote a number of times, and it still brings me a chill.
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
spat forth on el 9 de Octubre, 2007 at 02:31 PM
jim in austin dijo:
Perdóname ...
Palabras por jim in austin spat forth on el 9 de Octubre, 2007 at 02:50 PM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
dijo:
see? now that has punch.
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
spat forth on el 9 de Octubre, 2007 at 02:52 PM
RC dijo:
I had Cingular simply because I didn't want AT&T after the spying was uncovered, but then AT&T came to Puerto Rico and bought up Cingular, so now what?
T-Mobile is supposed to be entering the market here. They are buying out Suncomm.
Carlos Slim bought out Verizon also {calls it Claro now} and the musical chair buyouts keep me dizzy.
I just have boring business conversations on my phone anyway so I hope I put those intercept operators to sleep and they get fired.
I am considering how I could get rid of the phone but haven't come up with an answer yet. I have to operate the biz and get money to pay the vig.
Most of these big cell companies are also VERY involved in eliminating Net Neutrality. There has to be some other way to have a mobile phone without making pendejos rich and allowing them to profit from spying on me and taking the profits and squeezing the little sites out of the net.
Maybe I should just go back to hunting and gathering and the hell with civilization. I have dropped out completely back in 90-91 when I got really fed up. Hmmm. Seems tempting.
Palabras por RC spat forth on el 9 de Octubre, 2007 at 03:46 PM
johnlocke23 dijo:
““The hardest thing in the world is to assume the mood of a warrior. It is of no use to be sad and complain and feel justified in doing so, believing that someone is always doing something to us. Nobody is doing anything to anybody, much less to a warrior.”” -- Carlos Casteneda
Palabras por johnlocke23 spat forth on el 10 de Octubre, 2007 at 10:21 AM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
dijo:
It's a great quote. In regard to this post, it could be interpreted a few ways given no deeper context, so I won't guess at that part. But thanks.
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
spat forth on el 10 de Octubre, 2007 at 10:28 AM
johnlock23 dijo:
You are right of course- about context and interpretation, that is. It's just that in the context of privacy and communication, I try not to fall into the fright trap that these cabrones try all the time. To assume the "mood of the warrior, to me is to do everything "al medio del camino" - open and in public. Don't misunderstand - I sometimes buy the whole fear trip too - then I want to keep my fear private - but mostly I do and say what I want to say and I'm not scared of none of em. When this fear happens to me I remember to assume the mood once again - after all "fear is the mind killer." (Dune) Sorry to be so full of quotes instead of jsut coming on directly but it feels more like family to be able to practice a worthy philosophy by linking to others...
Palabras por johnlock23 spat forth on el 10 de Octubre, 2007 at 08:49 PM
johnnyboy dijo:
i'm beginning 2 think dems aren't scared 2 stop the eavesdropping but willing participants.if anyone thinks there using it 2 find terrorists there wrong.it's 2 stop dissent.keep us in line.maybe the dems want 2 do the same.hell i don't know but they sure as hell could b doing something about it and there not.
Palabras por johnnyboy spat forth on el 11 de Octubre, 2007 at 07:36 AM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
dijo:
oh, i see johnlock23. well, for me it is not about fear. it is about sovereignty of my self. you are basically saying the same thing as "what do you have to be afraid of?" and i keep saying, it is not about fear. it is about accepting control or abuse of my person or agreements or personal space. like someone thrusting their foot through my window and telling me "too bad i'm keeping it here." and i'm saying i am not afraid to push their foot back out the window or slam it on them.
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
spat forth on el 11 de Octubre, 2007 at 07:41 AM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
dijo:
yes, jonnyboy. of course they want to keep us in line. but really, i think they are too caught up in the whole game to threaten its workings too much. they are big wind-testers.
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
spat forth on el 11 de Octubre, 2007 at 07:42 AM
johnlocke23 dijo:
Ok Nez,
I see that and the way you put it together teaches me something because to me the whole warrior reference is indeed about personal sovreignty. And yeah, action is the optimal feature of "the mood of the warrior." ("push their foot back out the window or slam it on them.")
Good talkin
Palabras por johnlocke23 spat forth on el 11 de Octubre, 2007 at 08:56 AM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
dijo:
right on, amigo. :)
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
spat forth on el 11 de Octubre, 2007 at 09:12 AM