« Eufrosina for Mayor! | Main | Foto del Mes »
28 de Enero, 2008
The Funny Thing About Gang-Rape
Categorized under Closing in on Bush , Violencia | Tags: bush, E.L. Doctorow, hypocrisy, Saudi Arabia
IN HONOR OF GEORGE W(ARMONGER) BUSH and his scheduled (and bound to be pathetic) Pseudo-State of the Union, I bring back what seems to have been one of Fugya's sunnier moments: contemplating the gangrape of a Saudi woman who was then sentenced to 200 lashes for being gangraped. You can understand why the topic makes him smile, it's got so many elements that a Decider loves to contemplate. Pain, sadism, injustice, blood, violence, and oil-rich geography.
Behold, your Unfeeling and Judicially-Certified "President":
REPORTER: At the Annapolis Summit, you used your influence to get Saudi Arabia to the table, but i wonder now if you will use your influence to do something about the Saudi rape case that has gotten so much internation attention.
what goes through your mind when you hear about a 19 year old saudi woman getting gangraped by seven men and basically a Saudi court blames the victim and sentenced her to 200 lashes?
You spoke to King Abdullah by telephone the last couple weeks, did you press him on this case, and if so what did you say?
And if not, are you giving him a pass?
[Bush's initial reaction to the question about gangrape and injustice.]
[The Bush thing seriouses up its face, because cameras are on.]
"My first thoughts, ah, were these: What happens if this happened to my daughter?"
[Bush imagines.]
"How would i react? And um, I would have been, um, I would have been, I'd have, ah, I'd have been very emotional, of course.* I'd have been angry at those who, ah, committed the crime. and i'd be angry at the state that didn't support the victim. and our feelings were expressed by Dana Perino. From the podium."
Q: But did you press King Abdullah about it personally?
BUSH: Ah, I talked to King Abdullah about the Middle Eastern Peace, I , uh, don't remember if that subject came up.
Q: But is that important to you? Why wouldn't you bring it, at that level, bring it up personally to King Abdullah?
BUSH reacts:
—CNN video, here
Let's keep the true nature of the Bush-thing in our minds as he talks to a television camera tonight. Let's remember him mocking the soon-to-be electrocuted as they plead for life. Let's remember his idea of the vast suffering and pain and injury and sorrow that is his trademark accomplishment—the Iraq invasion and occupation—is that it is but a spindly and inconsequential punctuation mark in the great annals of his legacy. Let's remember this thing standing before us is the same thing that took great joy in blowing up frogs with firecrackers and that never outgrew the sick glee. Let us write down and remember that this creature only stutters and stammers when asked to experience genuing compassion or empathy, but gets very determined and juiced up when discussing and envisioning death and war and rape. Let's remember that this visionary has introduced an age of eternal terror and fear and war.
This "bush"-entity is the sickest being I've been forced to witness for a very long time. But I don't think its story is over. No, I think we're barely into the third act. And I'm watching this one all the way through.
Just not the State of the Union. Not watching that piece of smegmavision. As the Decider has said, you just shouldn't pay attention to every little aberration on ya screen.
*Bush talking about how if his daughters were gangraped (complete with the fake-thoughtful expression) he would be very "emotional" "of course" reminds me SO much of American Psycho, where the madness of the character really comes through because Bret Easton Ellis has the narrator try to emptily convince himself that he is real, that he does have feelings. After you watch him gut a homeless person for no reason.
Happy memories: another sunny moment for The Deciderer.










Comentarios (3)
William dijo:
Funny thing about Bush. A woman who filed a rape charge against him was found dead of a shotgun blast to the face. Ruled a suicide.
Of course the detractors were busy doing a Dan Rather on the story, and it got scant media attention here, but elsewhere...
http://www.melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2003/12/59604.php
Palabras por William spat forth on el 28 de Enero, 2008 at 12:02 PM
nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
dijo:
a coincidence, i'm sure.
Palabras por nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez
spat forth on el 28 de Enero, 2008 at 05:51 PM
Joan Kelly dijo:
He gives me the creep-and-a-halfs. And I had never heard that about a woman accusing him of rape and then dying. WTF.
Also, this may be nitpicky or off topic or irrelevant, but the whole "I am proving that I see others as equally human to me by conjuring the image of caring about my own daughters" or whatever the fuck that was - he is not the only person to say "ugh, I feel for (whoever she is) because I know if it happened to MY daughter..." And that aggravates me. Not that people care about their daughters, or sometimes use cliched ways of "relating" to others, but the subtle hidden thing in there (at least to me) that, I don't know.... I'm trying to say, could some person you don't know still matter whether you have a relative you can compare them to? Not, "don't imagine a stranger as if she were your own blood" but rather - could you still say this person matters whether you have a daughter or not, whether it could possibly ever happen to your daughter or not, etc.? Do I just have cranky hormones today or does that make any sense? Or both? I know it's not neither, ha, cuz one is a non-variable part of the equation shall we say.
Palabras por Joan Kelly spat forth on el 30 de Enero, 2008 at 10:32 AM