« ¡Que Vivan Los San Patricios! | Main | 257,000 »
18 de Marzo, 2008
Horses in the Klieglight
Categorized under Hipnotismo , Medios , Race for '08 | Tags: blogs, Clinton, Geraldine Ferraro, Huffington Post, Jeremiah Wright, Obama
But if I could ask a question of the media figures who are regularly calling for Obama to reject Wright today, who urged Clinton to reject Geraldine Ferraro the day before and who demanded Obama reject Louis Farrakhan earlier last week, it would be this: what would satisfy you? What action could any of these candidates take to settle the matter -- that they have their own ideas and positions and are not some sort of tabula rasa that sponges up only the most mean-minded things the people with whom they have come in contact with have espoused?
WELL, I don't know if I would analogize Ferraro with Farrakhan or Wright...unless Farrakhan and Wright were in the employ of Obama's campaign.
But I do like the image of a slate (tabula) working like a sponge. I admit it. I'm into the whole morphed metaphor scene. We're not kinky. We're just different.
![]() If you believe all the racket and clamor, it would seem that this occasion calls for Barack Obama to do something major, something grandiose, something that leaves no doubt at all that his feelings of rejection toward the statements of Reverend Wright are deep and vast and absolute. Maybe he should go so far as to invite Wright to a media event, and then hit him repeatedly with a large stick of some kind! It is possible, however, that even this might not be enough to satisfy some people, and, indeed, the violent acts, while leaving no doubt as to the ferocity of Obama's repudiation, may go too far, and offend others. Instead, Obama will go before the kliegs tomorrow and deliver a "major speech about race" that will likely actually be a "major speech about some crazy stuff a guy said during a sermon at a black church." There's a good chance that his "major speech about race" will be sufficient, like the time Mitt Romney gave his "major speech about religion" that everyone loved and which solved all of his problems. But there's also a chance that his speech will fail and spell doom for his candidacy, like the time Mitt Romney gave his "major speech about religion" that everyone thought was phony and made the media remember how awesome John McCain was. If Obama fails to address the matter, it could be bad. But if he does address the matter, the results could be equally ungood, only maybe doubleplus so. In the end, what will it matter? At some point, there will be other figures, and other remarks, that candidates will need to repudiate. If Obama survives, he may have to repudiate Tony Rezko by allowing Fox News to burn his house to the ground on national television. Someone might remember that John McCain has warmly embraced religious bigots of his own, and force McCain to subject them to the same tortures he faced as a soldier in order to ensure a perfect karmic balance. And if Clinton gets the nomination, well... let's just say I have it on good authority that she might be connected to a major political figure who was once put through an impeachment trial. Yeah. You may think we're not going to hear all about that sooner or later. But I'd think again if I were you. There's nothing the political media loves so much as the damnation game. In fact, that's probably the root of their beef with Reverend Wright in the first place: when he "damned America," he was muscling in on their turf. —Obama's Race Speech: Damned If He Does, Damned If He Doesn't |
I just thought the part about obama taking wright to a sporting event and hitting him with a large stick for the media was hilarious. (media event, not sporting event, but i'm keeping it "sporting event" in my mind because that makes me laugh more.) And PLEASE let us have a reality TV show where politicians do insane things to prove how straight they are! I wouldn't need another gift in this lifetime, braugh. We can call it KLIEGLIGHT, even.
What? I'm treating it like some game? But...isn't it?
Even if someone did bring a new politics to the arena—or just meant to put the idea in motion—would the media report it?
Your roll.





Comentarios (2)
Rafael dijo:
I saw the video and post it on my blog. Only two things seem out of order, the rest where the truth.
Palabras por Rafael spat forth on el 18 de Marzo, 2008 at 09:33 AM
William dijo:
It is absolutely infuriating at the hypocrisy of America's white McChristians.They are screaming for the head of 'reverend' Wright, yet utterly silent on the Hagees and Robertsons who are more dangerous,and utterly treasonous in theior rabid hatred of American democracy.
Here are a few examples, from a blog by Frank Schaeffer on the Huffpo
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/frank-schaeffer/obamas-minister-committe_b_91774.html
Obama's Minister Committed "Treason" But When My Father Said the Same Thing He Was a Republican Hero
These are just a few examples. I would encourage EVERYONE to start being vocal about these destructive, hate-filled and maybe even downright evil people.
a place to start:
Theocracywatch
http://www.theocracywatch.org
If you are in Texas(or interested in Texas because the religious right is setting the stage here):
The Texas freedom Network
http://www.tfn.org/
I also encourage ALL rational and heart-felt Christians to take up the fight against these reich-wing Christianists. It is worth remembering that the fascist religious states that make up a large part of the Islamic middle-east came into being because of small groups of crazed fanatics got busy
Palabras por William spat forth on el 18 de Marzo, 2008 at 11:07 AM