« Occupational Hazard | Main | Cesar Chavez Day? »

30 de Marzo, 2008

US Court Overturns Mumia Abu-Jamal's Death Sentence

Categorized under Derechos Humanos , Gobierno , Guest Blogando , Ley , Raza , Xicanopwr | Tags: African Americans, Black Panthers, Criminal Justice System, Democracy Now, Justicia, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Robert R. Bryan, Ronald Reagan


[Edmundo Rocha AKA Xicanopwr AKA XP is a guest blogger at The Unapologetic Mexican and blogs regularly at ¡Para Justicia y Libertad! and Scholars and Rogues.]



On Thursday, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the death sentence of the imprisoned journalist and former Black Panther, Mumia Abu-Jamal, while upholding his conviction and rejected his call for a new trial. A three-judge panel ruled that Abu-Jamal, who has been on death row for twenty-six years, deserves a new sentencing hearing because the jury was given flawed instructions in the penalty phase. They ruled that Mumia Abu-Jamal must be sentenced to life in prison for killing Daniel Faulkner or get a chance with a new Philadelphia jury that would decide only whether he should be sentenced to life or get the death penalty.

Abu-Jamal's lead attorney, Robert R. Bryan, told Democracy Now! that he will request a hearing before the full appeals court "within the next few weeks."

JUAN GONZALEZ: So now, with this, since this was a decision, a split decision, of a panel of the Third Circuit, is it possible then to appeal to the entire Third Circuit on this decision?

ROBERT BRYAN: Well, Juan, you've actually—you’ve certainly been doing your homework. That's exactly what we will be doing within the next few weeks. And that is, this was a decision by three judges, two-to-one; now we will be going before the entire court, all the judges, asking them to review this issue.

Abu-Jamal was sentenced to death in 1982 for the murder of police officer Daniel Faulkner in 1981 after the police officer pulled over Abu-Jamal's brother, William Cook, in an overnight traffic stop. According to court records, Abu-Jamal, who was on the opposite side of the street, ran toward Officer Faulkner and Cook. As he approached, Abu-Jamal shot Faulkner in the back. As Faulkner was falling to the ground, he drew his own gun and managed to shoot Abu Jamal in the chest, wounding but not killing him. Abu-Jamal was taken directly from the scene of the shooting to Thomas Jefferson University Hospital to receive treatment for his injuries.

The case went to trial in June 1982 in Philadelphia. Judge Albert F. Sabo initially agreed to Abu-Jamal's request to represent himself, with criminal defense attorney Anthony Jackson acting as his legal advisor. During the first day of the trial this decision was reversed and Jackson was ordered to resume acting as Abu-Jamal's sole advocate by reason of what the judge deemed to be intentionally disruptive actions on Abu-Jamal's part.

Abu-Jamal has argued in numerous appeals that racism by the judge and prosecutors corrupted his conviction at the hands of a mostly white jury. In his dissent, Judge Thomas Ambro, a Clinton appointee to the bench, strongly criticized his two colleagues, Chief Judge Anthony Scirica and Judge Robert Cowan (both Reagan appointees), and said their was racism in this case. Judge Ambro felt there was racial bias when it came to jury selection in Mumia Abu-Jamal trial. Judge Ambro also accused his colleagues of having a double standard in their rulings.

Our Court has previously reached the merits of Batson claims on habeas review in cases where the petitioner did not make a timely objection during jury selection—signaling that our Circuit does not have a federal contemporaneous objection rule—and I see no reason why we should not afford Abu-Jamal the courtesy of our precedents.

Judge Thomas Ambro also disputed the timeliness standard and said that Abu-Jamal presented enough evidence to warrant further investigation of the exclusion claims. Read the court's full opinion click here.

Although it is disappointing that the court did not give Abu-Jamal a new trial, however, his attorney does see the silver lining to in the ruling and Judge Thomas Ambro's dissent and still feels he can free Mumia Abu-Jamal.

For more information on the free Mumia Abu-Jamal movement, click here and here.

To listen to Mumia's commentaries, visit prisonradio.org and fsrn.org.


XP's writing fuses an intense level of research with an instinctive feel for the zeitgeist and a sense of empathy that combines to produce commentary that is, in the literal meaning of the word, unique. This (unique) entry posted at 2:10 PM. 
 | Top | View blog reactions